Quote Post

[T]he Labour response to CASE is mostly noteworthy for what it does not say. While the party blows its own trumpet regarding its major investment in science since 1997 — and it has much to be proud of — Brown does not commit to any further increases in spending, or even to keeping funding as it is.

…

It is fair for Labour to claim some credit for installing chief scientific advisers in “almost all government departments”. But it omits the fact that the missing department is the Treasury — perhaps the most important of the lot — and unlike the Lib Dems, it makes no commitment to appointing one.

Times Science Editor Mark Henderson responds to Labour’s Science Manifesto and letter to CaSE.
Posted on Wednesday, April 28, 2010.
Scientists, engineers, sysadmins, statisticians, students, code-monkeys, graphic designers, LARPers, trainspotters, grammarians, gamers, typographers, stamp-collecters all geeking the vote for the Liberal Democrats.

Blog front page

Visit geekthevote.org.uk

Join our Facebook Group

Follow @geekthevote on Twitter

Recent tweets using the #geekthevote tag




Submit content to the Geek the Vote blog
Previous Next